2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72586-2_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerium (III) Complexes Modeling with Sparkle/PM3

Abstract: Abstract.The Sparkle/PM3 model is extended to cerium(III) complexes. The validation procedure was carried out using only high quality crystallographic structures (R factor < 0.05Å), for a total of thirty-seven Ce(III) complexes. The Sparkle/PM3 unsigned mean error, for all interatomic distances between the Ce(III) ion and the directly coordinating oxygen or nitrogen atoms, is 0.080Å, a level of accuracy equivalent to the Sparkle/AM1 figure of 0.083Å. Moreover, their accuracy is similar to what can be obtained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30 The geometric structures were optimized with density functional theory (DFT) using B3LYP exchangecorrelation hybrid functional. 31 The Pople's all electron basis set 6-311++G(3df, 3pd) 32 was used for H, Li, Na, K, Cl, and O, and the Stuttgart-Köln MCDHF RSC effective core potential (ECP, 28 core electrons) basis set aug-cc-pVTZ-PP 33 obtained from the EMSL basis set exchange 34 was used for I.…”
Section: B Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 The geometric structures were optimized with density functional theory (DFT) using B3LYP exchangecorrelation hybrid functional. 31 The Pople's all electron basis set 6-311++G(3df, 3pd) 32 was used for H, Li, Na, K, Cl, and O, and the Stuttgart-Köln MCDHF RSC effective core potential (ECP, 28 core electrons) basis set aug-cc-pVTZ-PP 33 obtained from the EMSL basis set exchange 34 was used for I.…”
Section: B Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it can be seen from Table 1, the semiempirical calculations via Sparkle/AM1 and Sparkle/PM6 result in a notable error. Meanwhile, the Sparkle [17,18] model implementation in the oldest parameterization models by J. J. P. Stewart, namely PM3, [12] resulted in a very good agreement with the experiment (average deviation for two axes of 1.46%), with the deviation only insignificantly higher than that in DFT approach (deviation of 0.91%, Table 1, in italic).…”
Section: Computationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The semiempirical computations were performed on the supercell using AM1, [11] , RM1, [3] PM3, [12] PM6, [13] and PM7 [2] semiempirical methods with the appropriate Sparkle models [5,[14][15][16][17][18][19] for lanthanide ions, Ln 31 were used for computations. They are the only methods supplied with the Sparkle model for Ce 31 and Tb 31 .…”
Section: Semiempirical Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations