1932
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/24.3-4.471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Certain Generalizations in the Analysis of Variance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
171
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 839 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
171
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this procedure, each individual was allocated to the group with the nearest centroid (Ripley, 1996) and the proportion of correctly allocated individuals calculated. The discriminatory effectiveness of the analysis was also accessed using the Wilks' lambda (k) (Wilks, 1932) and the Cohen's Kappa (j) (Cohen, 1960), which according to Titus et al (1984) provide more reliable results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this procedure, each individual was allocated to the group with the nearest centroid (Ripley, 1996) and the proportion of correctly allocated individuals calculated. The discriminatory effectiveness of the analysis was also accessed using the Wilks' lambda (k) (Wilks, 1932) and the Cohen's Kappa (j) (Cohen, 1960), which according to Titus et al (1984) provide more reliable results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , m, Wilks [14] expressed the probability density function of the random variable Y = m k=1 Y k as the (m − 1)-fold integral…”
Section: Main Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CA compared the relative abundance of different fi sh species among reef zones of each transect (56 sampling stations). To identify the fi sh communities on CA, Wilks' test (Wilks, 1932) was used. This statistical test compared variation between communities to variation within each community.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%