2005
DOI: 10.1039/b503655k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Certification of a fish otolith reference material in support of quality assurance for trace element analysis

Abstract: Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at Certification of a fish otolith reference material in support of quality assurance for trace element analysis Sturgeon, R.; Willie, S. N.; Yang, L.; Greenberg, R.; Spatz, R. O.; Chen, Z.; Scriver, C.; Clancy, V.; Lam, J.; Thorrold, S.http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/jsp/nparc_cp.jsp?lang=fr L'accès à ce site Web et l'utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instrument blanks of 2% HNO 3 were run at the beginning, middle, and end of a block of 10 otoliths, and were linearly interpolated. Dissolved otolith certified reference material (CRM) (Yoshinaga et al 2000) was used to correct for instrument mass bias (Rosenthal et al 1999), and instrument precision was assessed using a second type of otolith CRM (Sturgeon et al 2005). Detection limits were calculated as 3 standard deviations of the blanks that were run throughout the analyses (n = 219).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instrument blanks of 2% HNO 3 were run at the beginning, middle, and end of a block of 10 otoliths, and were linearly interpolated. Dissolved otolith certified reference material (CRM) (Yoshinaga et al 2000) was used to correct for instrument mass bias (Rosenthal et al 1999), and instrument precision was assessed using a second type of otolith CRM (Sturgeon et al 2005). Detection limits were calculated as 3 standard deviations of the blanks that were run throughout the analyses (n = 219).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To correct for mass bias and instrument drift, standards were run periodically during the analyses. For shell analyses, the solutionbased standards included an aragonitic otolith reference material (Yoshinaga et al 2000) and the certified reference material (CRM) FEBS-1 (Sturgeon et al 2005 Pb in low-resolution mode. These elements were chosen because of their previous use in successful elemental tagging studies (Kalish 1989, Elsdon & Gillanders 2002, Zacherl et al 2003b, Bath Martin & Thorrold 2005.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser conditions were set to a frequency of 10 Hz and 60% energy. The typical Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) were used (Yoshinaga et al, 2000;Sturgeon et al, 2005), and sampled using the same instrument conditions at the beginning and end of each working session and after every 20 LA-spots. LA-ICPMS output data were processed using Glitter software (GEMOC, Macquarie University) to obtain element concentrations (µg Me /g otolith ) based on natural isotope ratios and using Ca 43 as an internal standard.…”
Section: Otolith Chemical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%