2010
DOI: 10.6028/nist.sp.260-172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Certification of Three NIST Renewal Soil Standard Reference Materials for Element Content

Abstract: Element Concentrations). These materials have been used worldwide for quality assurance by a variety of laboratories involved in the determination of major, minor, and trace element content of soils and similar materials. Stocks of these original SRMs were depleted by 2008, and replacement SRMs were produced which became available in 2009. This paper describes, in detail, the process for the renewal of these three soil SRMs including soil collection and preparation methods, homogeneity assessment, experimental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations of all analyzed elements are reported as mg/kg. Elemental recovery rates for both reference materials are shown in Table S2 of Supporting Information , and are comparable to those reported for other NIST materials digested using similar methods (Mackey et al., 2010). Recovery rates of a few elements from soil samples (e.g.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Concentrations of all analyzed elements are reported as mg/kg. Elemental recovery rates for both reference materials are shown in Table S2 of Supporting Information , and are comparable to those reported for other NIST materials digested using similar methods (Mackey et al., 2010). Recovery rates of a few elements from soil samples (e.g.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Concentrations of all analyzed elements are reported as mg/kg. Elemental recovery rates for both reference materials are shown in Table S2 of Supporting Information S1, and are comparable to those reported for other NIST materials digested using similar methods (Mackey et al, 2010). Recovery rates of a few elements from soil samples (e.g., Al, K, Cr, V) were lower than 70% due to the fact that the acid digestion method may not fully solubilize the mineral lattices where some proportion of these elements may reside (Mackey et al, 2010).…”
Section: Lab Analysessupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each experimental run, blank filters were prepared using the same methods as the dust samples, and SR-XRF data were collected to validate the experimental run and ensure that during transport or storage, no significant contamination occurred. Also, a calibration batch of reference standards prepared with comparable amounts of NIST reference soil (NIST 2709a, San Juaquin soil [16]) was regularly measured.…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%