2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2012.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Certifying feasibility and objective value of linear programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For chemical reaction networks with mass-action kinetics, the concentration dynamics are governed by dynamical systems (2) with polynomial maps f κ (x) = A κ x B , as defined in (1). We introduce some terms that are standard in the chemical engineering literature.…”
Section: Motivation From Chemical Reaction Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For chemical reaction networks with mass-action kinetics, the concentration dynamics are governed by dynamical systems (2) with polynomial maps f κ (x) = A κ x B , as defined in (1). We introduce some terms that are standard in the chemical engineering literature.…”
Section: Motivation From Chemical Reaction Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we can verify the infeasibility of (11) by checking the infeasibility of the system of linear inequalities obtained by replacing the inequalities > 0 and < 0 by ≥ ǫ and ≤ −ǫ, respectively, for an arbitrary ǫ ∈ R + . In this setting, one can apply methods for exact linear programming, which makes use of Farkas' lemma to guarantee the infeasibility of linear programs by way of rational certificates; see for example [1,3,36] and the exact linear programming solver QSopt ex [4]. An alternative is to develop and adapt exact linear programming methods for strict inequalities using Theorems of the Alternative (Transposition theorems); see for example [51,64].…”
Section: Algorithmic Verification Of Sign Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%