2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61684-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data for 16 573 women with cervical cancer and 35 509 women without cervical cancer from 24 epidemiological studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

11
101
3
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 419 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
11
101
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the recent meta-analysis [17], the present study failed to establish any increased risk of cervical disease for the length of HOC usage. Unexpectedly, women testing HR-HPV-positive and those having cervical abnormalities ranging from CIN1 to invasive cancer presented with shorter times of HOC usage, which can be considered a contentious finding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the recent meta-analysis [17], the present study failed to establish any increased risk of cervical disease for the length of HOC usage. Unexpectedly, women testing HR-HPV-positive and those having cervical abnormalities ranging from CIN1 to invasive cancer presented with shorter times of HOC usage, which can be considered a contentious finding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the present cohort of over 12,000 women, we failed to confirm any part of the results from this pivotal meta-analysis [17]. Our data unequivocally showed that hormonal contraceptive use (or length of use) is not an independent risk factor of high-grade CIN lesions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cervical cancer risk is double in current oral contraceptives (OC) users who have used OCs for 5 or more years, compared to people who have never used it [21]. Cervical cancer risk may increase with longer duration of use, but is no higher in women who last took OCs 10 or more years than in those who have never used it [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%