2021
DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2021.1997353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical Cancer Classification from Pap Smear Images Using Modified Fuzzy C Means, PCA, and KNN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest values for this method are 1.00, 98.77, 98.76, 98.77 and 25.74 for precision, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and PSNR values, respectively. Based on the previous studies that has been reviewed, the performance of approaches used previously has resulted in precision values of 0.98 [46], 0.96 [47], 0.99 [48], sensitivity 98.83% [46], 95.83% [33], 97.96% [47], specificity 97.9% [45], 98.5% [46], 90.62% [33], 83.65% [47], 99.70 [48], accuracy 98.3% [45], 98.38 [46], 95.08% [33], 96.28% [47], 99.70% [48], 90% [49]. The values obtained from the experiment for method 1, which is thresholding and trace region boundaries in a binary image, outperform other methods in terms of precision, sensitivity and specificity from previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest values for this method are 1.00, 98.77, 98.76, 98.77 and 25.74 for precision, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and PSNR values, respectively. Based on the previous studies that has been reviewed, the performance of approaches used previously has resulted in precision values of 0.98 [46], 0.96 [47], 0.99 [48], sensitivity 98.83% [46], 95.83% [33], 97.96% [47], specificity 97.9% [45], 98.5% [46], 90.62% [33], 83.65% [47], 99.70 [48], accuracy 98.3% [45], 98.38 [46], 95.08% [33], 96.28% [47], 99.70% [48], 90% [49]. The values obtained from the experiment for method 1, which is thresholding and trace region boundaries in a binary image, outperform other methods in terms of precision, sensitivity and specificity from previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) classification uses k-fold cross-validation to classify Pap smear images into abnormal and normal cells. The results of the suggested technique are contrasted with Linear Discriminant, Ensemble Bagged trees, and Fine Gaussian SVM [4].…”
Section: Review Of the Study 21 Nucleus Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical cancer has the second-highest death rate among women in developing nations, behind breast cancer, and is among the tumors that can be treated if detected soon enough [4,5]. Early detection and Pap smear cell images' classification are crucial in identifying cervical cancer [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practicality of using the texture attribute is its major draw. Support vector machine (SVM), LDA (Linear Discriminant Analysis), k-nearest neighbour (KNN), and ANN (Artificial Neural Networks) are the most frequently utilised classifiers in multi-cell cervical image analysis [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Numerous research studies have been conducted on the detection of cervical cancer, however the majority of these studies only focused on the segmentation of nuclei regions [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%