2017
DOI: 10.4103/tjog.tjog_66_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical cancer screening and practice in low resource countries: Nigeria as a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18,19 In another study, screening gaps were attributed to demand-side barriers like cost and the nonavailability of local screening services. 20 These, and similar studies, [16][17][18][19]21,22 provide a basis for proposing solutions and charting a course forward towards progress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 In another study, screening gaps were attributed to demand-side barriers like cost and the nonavailability of local screening services. 20 These, and similar studies, [16][17][18][19]21,22 provide a basis for proposing solutions and charting a course forward towards progress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algunos países de bajos recursos han introducido la inspección visual con ácido acético (IVAA) como programa nacional, ya que la técnica de ver y tratar disminuye la cantidad de visitas al médico y ha demostrado eficacia significativa para lesiones de alto grado (6,7) . No obstante, esta no es la estrategia más recomendada debido a sus limitaciones.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…There is also a lack of operational policy, strategy or action to reduce the burden of tobacco use [14], and complete absence of bans on advertising, promoting and sponsorship which increases risk of cancer [15]. Cancer screening and early detection of cancer are not generally available at the public primary health care level [16,17]. Cancer treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy are not generally available in the public health system [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%