2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13402-011-0061-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical carcinoma-associated fibroblasts are DNA diploid and do not show evidence for somatic genetic alterations

Abstract: BackgroundCancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) have been recognized as important contributors to cancer development and progression. However, opposing evidence has been published whether CAFs, in addition to epigenetic, also undergo somatic genetic alterations and whether these changes contribute to carcinogenesis and tumour progression.MethodsWe combined multiparameter DNA flow cytometry, flow-sorting and 6K SNP-arrays to study DNA aneuploidy, % S-phase, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and copy number alteration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large potential LOH region in HeLa chromosome 3 is depicted in detail along with allele frequencies, CN, coverage, SNVs, and rearrangements in Figure 2 (plots for all chromosomes are in Figure S2). Many of the homozygous segments in the HeLa genome correspond to previously reported LOH cervical cancer hotspots, namely on chromosomes 3p, 6p, 11q, and 18q (Mitra et al 1994; Mullokandov et al 1996; Rader et al 1998; Koopman et al 2000; Vermeulen et al 2005; Corver et al 2011). This finding suggests that these LOH events arose during the cervical cancer, prior to cultivation of the HeLa cell line.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A large potential LOH region in HeLa chromosome 3 is depicted in detail along with allele frequencies, CN, coverage, SNVs, and rearrangements in Figure 2 (plots for all chromosomes are in Figure S2). Many of the homozygous segments in the HeLa genome correspond to previously reported LOH cervical cancer hotspots, namely on chromosomes 3p, 6p, 11q, and 18q (Mitra et al 1994; Mullokandov et al 1996; Rader et al 1998; Koopman et al 2000; Vermeulen et al 2005; Corver et al 2011). This finding suggests that these LOH events arose during the cervical cancer, prior to cultivation of the HeLa cell line.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Studies that found a positive somatic alteration in CAFs, without exception, have extracted DNA from archival tissues. In other studies (10,47,136,137), CAFs were isolated from fresh frozen tissues or flow cytometry; no somatic genetic alterations were found, while CAFs from FFPE show a high frequency of LOH and AI. This pattern indicates that FFPE tissues could result in highly fragmented DNA and RNA molecules, which are not suitable for large-scale genetic analysis.…”
Section: Controversies and Further Outlookmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recent genetic studies conducted in CAFs derived from human ovarian and breast tumors have demonstrated that unlike epithelial cancer cells, copy number alterations, loss of heterozygosity, and/or the number of TP53 mutations are extremely rare in CAFs (4%-5% of samples). Such rare alterations therefore cannot constitute the basis for the widespread tumor-promoting phenotypes exemplified by CAFs (Qiu et al 2008;Hosein et al 2010;Corver et al 2011).…”
Section: Caf: Cell or State?mentioning
confidence: 99%