2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-011-1986-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical gland area: a new sonographic marker in predicting preterm delivery

Abstract: Non detection of CGA at second trimester ultrasonography is a predictor of preterm delivery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the assessment of tissue elasticity, several strategies such as the cervical consistency index [59] and a cervical aspiration device [60] have also been evaluated. The absence of the cervical gland area has also been proposed as a predictor of preterm birth [61,62]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the assessment of tissue elasticity, several strategies such as the cervical consistency index [59] and a cervical aspiration device [60] have also been evaluated. The absence of the cervical gland area has also been proposed as a predictor of preterm birth [61,62]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several markers in asymptomatic women, including serum proteins, ultrasound imaging, and cervicovaginal proteins, have been suggested as predictive tests for preterm birth. [27][28][29] The development of additional non-invasive biomarkers for the prediction of preterm birth in twins would be very valuable.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods are able to assess cervical biomechanical characteristics such as distensibility and tissue stiffness [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] , uterine cervix composition and optical characteristics [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] . Unfortunately, most of these methods are invasive and evaluate only a specific part of the cervix, which is an important limitation taking into account the heterogeneity of the uterine cervix structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%