1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf02386598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical meningeal histiocytosis demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: Involvement of the central nervous system by histiocytosis X is usually restricted to the parasellar region. A rare case of histiocytosis X involving the cervical meninges in a 12-month-old boy is demonstrated and the magnetic resonance features of this tumor are described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH; histiocytosis X or eosinophilic granuloma) has a predilection for children less than 10 years of age. Involvement of the CNS or meninges usually represents contiguous spread from bony lesions of the skull (51,82). Nevertheless, suprasellar localization has also been described and may be associated with diabetes insipidus.…”
Section: Meningeal-based Masses Mimicking Meningiomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH; histiocytosis X or eosinophilic granuloma) has a predilection for children less than 10 years of age. Involvement of the CNS or meninges usually represents contiguous spread from bony lesions of the skull (51,82). Nevertheless, suprasellar localization has also been described and may be associated with diabetes insipidus.…”
Section: Meningeal-based Masses Mimicking Meningiomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Isolated involvement of the CNS by LCH without evidence of systemic disease is rare. Hypothalamic involvement 24,25,45 suggests disease; however, isolated involvement of the spinal cord 10,18,46 or cerebral cortex, as in our case, constitutes a diagnostic challenge. To our knowledge, only nine cases of isolated cerebral LCH have previously been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%