2019
DOI: 10.1111/ans.15238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical re‐explorations and proxy survival following parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism using Australian administrative data

Abstract: Background: Administrative data may have utility in the impartial assessment of surgical outcomes and rare events. We have used a publicly available sample of the Australian pharmaceutical and health service provision (medical benefits scheme) databases to assess outcomes following parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP). Methods: A cohort study using linked pharmaceutical and medical benefits schemes data was performed covering the period 1993-2014. Procedure codes identified participants unde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proxy mortality event marker used in this study has been previously applied in clinical experiments and was demonstrated to be of particular utility in persons age >45 [ 26 ]. Furthermore, the proxy marker has been useful in the assessment of long-term outcomes following surgical procedures [ 27 , 28 ]. In this study, reasonable correlation and accuracy of mortality rate ratios was shown in females with similar data from the AIHW [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proxy mortality event marker used in this study has been previously applied in clinical experiments and was demonstrated to be of particular utility in persons age >45 [ 26 ]. Furthermore, the proxy marker has been useful in the assessment of long-term outcomes following surgical procedures [ 27 , 28 ]. In this study, reasonable correlation and accuracy of mortality rate ratios was shown in females with similar data from the AIHW [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%