2017
DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1355110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical screening in Denmark – a success followed by stagnation

Abstract: The success of a screening program depends first of all on coverage and timely follow-up of abnormal findings. Our analysis indicated that the currently high incidence of cervical cancer in Denmark may partly be due to low screening coverage. Also worrisome is a high proportion of non-timely follow-up of abnormal findings. Innovative ways to improve coverage and follow-up are urgently needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, further indication of vaccine effectiveness might be obtained from data on the national time trend in detection of ASCUS. Such data have, however, been reported only since 2013,29, 30 showing a relative stable proportion about 3% with some variation across the Danish regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In principle, further indication of vaccine effectiveness might be obtained from data on the national time trend in detection of ASCUS. Such data have, however, been reported only since 2013,29, 30 showing a relative stable proportion about 3% with some variation across the Danish regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In Denmark, cervical cancer screening is organized as a nationwide integrated program based on a call–recall invitational system, which keeps track of women in the screening population, including women entering the population, and those who are no longer subscribed to the program (eg, due to hysterectomy). 22 Danish women are invited for cervical cancer screening every 3 years when aged 23–49 years and every 5 years when aged 50–64 years. 23 The invitation is sent by letter advising the woman to book an appointment to have a liquid-based cervical cytology specimen collected by her general practitioner (GP).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During our study period, Aptima was used in the region of Southern Denmark, whereas Proofer was used in the other 4 regions (see Supplementary material, Table ) . The coverage of cervical cancer screening, rates of abnormal smears, and cervical cancer incidence did not substantially differ between the region of Southern Denmark and the other regions during the study period . Furthermore, we found a similar age distribution in women tested with Proofer and Aptima, and only women with no previous abnormal cervical results were included in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%