2015
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient

Abstract: BACKGROUND With the use of the framework advocated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group, our aims were to perform a systematic review and to develop evidence-based recommendations that may be used to answer the following PICO [Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes] question: In the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient, should cervical collar removal be performed after a negative high-quality cervical spine (C-spine) computed tomography (CT) resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(17, 18) Since then, it has been widely adopted for evidence-based inquiry, especially in the development of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. (1924) Clinicians have also been recommended to structure their patient-specific clinical questions according to PICO. (18, 2529) Finally, information retrieval tools that structure queries according to the PICO format have shown promising results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17, 18) Since then, it has been widely adopted for evidence-based inquiry, especially in the development of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. (1924) Clinicians have also been recommended to structure their patient-specific clinical questions according to PICO. (18, 2529) Finally, information retrieval tools that structure queries according to the PICO format have shown promising results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a retrospective study design, accurate capture of the presenting clinical examination in particular remains a challenge. In 2015 the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma confronted this issue by performing a systematic review of the existing literature(23). They targeted a specific population, those who could not be cleared by the NEXUS low risk criteria due to being obtunded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contemporary evidence base is weak because of the small patient numbers and primarily retrospective design of many of the studies that are currently being used to drive practice(6-14). In 2015, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma published a comprehensive systematic review(7, 11, 12, 14-22) and practice management guidelines specifically for the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient(23). In summarizing five studies with a total of 1,017 patients meeting their entry criteria, the summary conclusion was that they would “conditionally recommend cervical collar removal after a negative high quality C-spine CT scan result alone”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of the same key points were highlighted in recent guidelines released by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) [12]. The very recent EAST guidelines conditionally recommend removing the cervical collar in the obtunded blunt trauma population after a negative high-quality CT (≥3-mm axial slice) with an acceptable missed injury rate of 0.3%.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 95%