1984
DOI: 10.1063/1.1137596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cesiated porous molybdenum converter for intense negative ion sources

Abstract: Maintaining the proper low work function surface in steady-state high-current-density negative ion sources is difficult, due to intense ion bombardment of the surface. Experiments were performed in which liquid cesium was forced through a porous molybdenum converter in order to obtain a low work function, while at the same time allowing the surface to be cooled. In a small steady-state hollow cathode discharge source, the H− yield from a porous molybdenum converter was five fold higher than from a solid molybd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…233 Porous Mo converter to supply Cs from the back side was also tested, and a performance better than a solid Mo converter coupled to Cs injection was achieved. 234 The surface production type ion source is still a viable option to produce H À ion beam with fair stability and intensity.…”
Section: B Surface Sources For Accelerator Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…233 Porous Mo converter to supply Cs from the back side was also tested, and a performance better than a solid Mo converter coupled to Cs injection was achieved. 234 The surface production type ion source is still a viable option to produce H À ion beam with fair stability and intensity.…”
Section: B Surface Sources For Accelerator Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of the new ion source is that by simply changing the polarity of the extraction voltage, positive ions with an intensity comparable to that of the original ion source can be produced. For negative ions the performance of this new construction could probably be improved further, for example by using a caesiated converter [5]. We emphasize the simplicity of its construction-most components of the original ion source are unchanged and the new source is operated in the same way as the original; the modified ion source is easy to dissemble and replacement of the filament in the new set-up is much quicker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the baseline converter (T ~350 o C) requires ~10 11 Cs/s to maintain a half-monolayer resulting in much more Cs lost to the LEBT. In related work, a 1983 experiment showed significantly more Hproduction from a porous versus solid converter [16]. Going forward we plan to test this configuration in the near future.…”
Section: Design Of a Direct-transfer Cs Systemmentioning
confidence: 94%