2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3583045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CETA and Air Pollution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10) In addition, using the same empirical specifications and models, but a dataset that contains the 28 EU members and Canada during the 1990-2016 time period, Qirjo et al (2019), , and investigate the existence of the EKC and find no evidence in its support for per capita emissions of GHGs and CO2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10) In addition, using the same empirical specifications and models, but a dataset that contains the 28 EU members and Canada during the 1990-2016 time period, Qirjo et al (2019), , and investigate the existence of the EKC and find no evidence in its support for per capita emissions of GHGs and CO2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be because CO 2 accounts for approximately 75% of all GHGs, and the former pollutant may drive the result of the latter. Other empirical studies have shown this to be the case: for example, Qirjo, Pascalau, and Krichevskiy (2019), Qirjo, Pascalau, and Krichevskiy (2020) and Qirjo, Pascalau, and Krichevskiy (2021) have shown that the implementation of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (a free trade agreement between Canada and the EU) could help decrease per capita emissions of GHGs and CO 2 , respectively, but increase per capita emissions of fluorinated gases (F-gases).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%