2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2010.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD approach for the moisture prediction in spray chamber for drying of salt solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 16) are then estimated to account for the resistance of liquid evaporation from the droplet and later on from the particle as a function of process parameters. The ability to express the REA model by ordinary differential equations ( 28) makes the REA model very attractive to be easily implemented in large scale modeling (computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation) of the spray drying process (3,43,44).…”
Section: Application Of Reaction Engineering Approach (Rea) For Modeling Single Droplet Drying Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 16) are then estimated to account for the resistance of liquid evaporation from the droplet and later on from the particle as a function of process parameters. The ability to express the REA model by ordinary differential equations ( 28) makes the REA model very attractive to be easily implemented in large scale modeling (computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation) of the spray drying process (3,43,44).…”
Section: Application Of Reaction Engineering Approach (Rea) For Modeling Single Droplet Drying Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Ali et al [7] developed a Eulerian-Lagrangian multiphase CFD simulation of a counter-current dryer and obtained solid phase concentration maps and residence time distributions of the discrete phase. Straatsma et al [8] and Salem et al [9] simulated the humidity and temperature contours of a co-current spray dryer to reduce fouling and adjust the energy consumption. Other reported studies focussing on the flow patterns of gas only and multiphase flow within the dryer including the effect of various geometric features are those of Langrish et al [10], who studied the effect of the spray opening angles; Southwell and Langrish [11], who observed a fluctuation pattern in the flow, the spinning of which along the longitudinal axis of the vessel switches from clockwise to anti-clockwise; and Xiao et al [12], who checked the dispersion behavior of a spray nozzle generating uniform sized particles.…”
Section: Latin Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above-presented literature for modeling the two-phase spray drying processes, authors used the Eulerian-Lagrangian multiphase modeling approach based on the Particle-Source-In Cell (PSI-CELL) model of Crowe et al [37] The choice for the turbulence model depended on the type of inlet flow. For low to moderate swirling flows, as encountered in co-current spray dryer geometries, the standard k-epsilon turbulence model has shown good accuracy [28,31,32,34,38,39], while for highly swirling flows such as those encountered in counter-current dryers, the Reynolds Stress Model [6,36,40], k-omega SST model [41], or k-epsilon RNG [29,42,43] were recommended. Furthermore, using reflecting particle-wall boundary conditions provided more accurate results than escape particle-wall boundary conditions [6,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%