2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD benchmark on hydrogen release and dispersion in confined, naturally ventilated space with one vent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the widespread utilization of hydrogen requires proper mitigative or preventive technologies to keep the total volume of the hydrogen release being smaller than 4% (lower flammability limit) or greater than 75% (upper flammability limit) [1][2][3] However, the distribution behaviors of the released hydrogen are difficult to be presented/quantified in experimental tests. In this regard, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software is capable of simulating the release of hydrogen with defined boundary conditions and the CFD simulation has been IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2198/1/012017 2 proven an effective method to predict a short and long term dispersion of hydrogen [4][5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the widespread utilization of hydrogen requires proper mitigative or preventive technologies to keep the total volume of the hydrogen release being smaller than 4% (lower flammability limit) or greater than 75% (upper flammability limit) [1][2][3] However, the distribution behaviors of the released hydrogen are difficult to be presented/quantified in experimental tests. In this regard, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software is capable of simulating the release of hydrogen with defined boundary conditions and the CFD simulation has been IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2198/1/012017 2 proven an effective method to predict a short and long term dispersion of hydrogen [4][5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [8] it is mentioned that not every partner conducted grid independence study and in some cases, time step was set to allow finishing calculations within logical time and thus suffered from low precision. Moreover, different grid types (hexahedral, tetrahedral and hybrid) were used without investigating their effect on the results [11]. For all the above, the first aim of the current study is to demonstrate the use of BPG that have been developed [13] for hydrogen safety CFD simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a typical problem that arises in wind tunnel experiments of pollutant dispersion in urban environment, but also in the scaled-down experimental analysis of hazardous gas releases in closed spaces such as tunnels or warehouses. The literature about this topic is quite extended, encompassing both papers specifically devoted to scaling procedures (Hall and Walker, 1997; Obasaju and Robins, 1998), guidelines for modelling atmospheric diffusion (Snyder, 1981; Snyder, 1985) or plume dispersion (Mavroidis et al , 2003), experimental validation of CFD simulations of near-field pollutant dispersion (Gousseau et al , 2011; Gupta et al , 2012; Tominaga and Stathopoulos, 2013; Tominaga and Stathopoulos, 2016; Yassin, 2013) and experimental and/or numerical investigation of hydrogen releases in confined (Ekoto et al , 2012; Houf et al , 2012; Houf et al , 2013), but also possibly ventilated (Giannissi et al , 2015) spaces. A wealth of investigations has been carried out to simulate the atmospheric boundary layer in wind tunnels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%