CFD–DEM modelling of particle flow in IsaMills – Comparison between simulations and PEPT measurements

A Mastercurve to predict annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) seed devitalisation when exposed to multiple single sided impacts

“…Initial particle size (m) b i o s y s t e m s e n g i n e e r i n g 1 3 3 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 5 6 e6 3 Peukert, 2005); mechanistic discrete element models (DEM) (Brosh, Kalman, & Levy, 2011;Jayasundara et al, 2011;Kalman, Rodnianski, & Haim, 2009;Teng, Wang, Zhang, & Gogos, 2011); and mechanistic computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models using a discrete particle phase (Chatzilamprou, Youds, Tierney, & Armstrong, 2006;Takeuchi, Nakamura, & Watano, 2013;Toneva, Wirth, & Peukert, 2011). Material functions for particle size reduction have been determined through impact testing of individual particles (Lecoq, Chamayou, Dodds, & Guigon, 2011;Vogel & Peukert, 2003a).…”

Analysis and modelling of bead contacts in wet-operating stirred media and planetary ball mills with CFD–DEM simulations

“…This can be done by computational fluid dynamics (see e.g. Jayasundara et al, 2011or Beinert et al, 2014 or by smoothed particles hydrodynamics (SPH, e.g. Cleary et al, 2006;Gao and Herbst, 2009).…”

Computational prediction of performance for a full scale Isamill: Part 2 – Wet models of charge and slurry transport

“…Nonetheless, this was the first wet DEM model of an Isamill and provides the first information on fluid flow in this mill. Jayasundara et al (2011c) then used this model to compare to PEPT (Positron Emission Particle Tracking) experiments. PEPT experiments for an M4 laboratory scale Isamill have been reported by van der Westhuizen et al (2011).…”