2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD investigation of the atmospheric boundary layer under different thermal stability conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, all profiles show zero gradient at the horizontal boundaries. For both actual and idealised models, the ground and building walls were assigned a no-slip condition and wall functions were used to calculate the turbulent kinetic energy at the wall nearest to the grid point [31,32]. The surface roughness height (z0) was taken as 0.1×11 m in AM and 0.1×11 mm in WTM [33].…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, all profiles show zero gradient at the horizontal boundaries. For both actual and idealised models, the ground and building walls were assigned a no-slip condition and wall functions were used to calculate the turbulent kinetic energy at the wall nearest to the grid point [31,32]. The surface roughness height (z0) was taken as 0.1×11 m in AM and 0.1×11 mm in WTM [33].…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral boundaries were assigned periodic conditions as well [9,12,26,29]. For both actual and idealised models, the ground and building walls were assigned a no-slip condition and wall functions were used to calculate the turbulent kinetic energy at the wall nearest grid point [30,31]. The surface roughness height (z0) was taken as 0.1×11 m in all models [32].…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFD codes employing RANS turbulence generally model the flow under turbulent conditions near walls using a wall function, providing that the flow velocity (constant) at the inlet is chosen to be the mean wind velocity of the wind profile [16]. The roughness of these surfaces is often expressed in terms of the equivalent wall roughness height k s [18,19].…”
Section: Using the Wall Function With A Uniform (Constant)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discrepancies could be reported as inaccuracies in the boundary conditions for the flow or the pollutant source and the underestimation of the turbulence kinetic energy [14,15]. The standard k-ε turbulence model, widely employed in the simulation of the ABL due to the availability of appropriate boundary conditions and meteorological data [16][17][18][19][20][21], will serve as the starting point in investigating of the ABL under the influence of surface heat flux. The re-normalization group (RNG) k-ε model which renormalizes the Navier-Stokes equations to account for small-scale turbulence [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%