2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD investigation on combustion and NO emission characteristics in a 600 MW wall-fired boiler under high temperature and strong reducing atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, these NO x can get a higher reduction in the primary zone since the residence time is longer. 15 Besides, injecting semi-coke from the lower layers increases the density of unburned carbon in the bottom and middle of the burner zone, which can effectively promote the reduction of NO x . 25 Therefore, the NO x emission in case 5 decreases evidently from case 4, and it is even lower than case 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Then, these NO x can get a higher reduction in the primary zone since the residence time is longer. 15 Besides, injecting semi-coke from the lower layers increases the density of unburned carbon in the bottom and middle of the burner zone, which can effectively promote the reduction of NO x . 25 Therefore, the NO x emission in case 5 decreases evidently from case 4, and it is even lower than case 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is different from the conventional coal-fired condition, in which the NO concentration generally gets declined through this zone, even though the air coefficient of primary zone is as high as 0.9. 15,27 In the primary zone, co-firing semi-coke could partly postpone the char combustion, which should mostly occur near the burners when firing bituminous coal. Since the char of semi-coke contains the majority of fuel-N, the char combustion would generate a considerable quality NO in this zone, which should be larger than the reduction rate of the upstream NO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The governing equations are the mass and energy conservation equations as follows: is calculated using Eq. (1) or (2), Cp, p is the specific heat of coal particle, and Qconv, Qtrad, and Qreac are the amounts of convective, radiative, and reaction heat transfers, respectively, and were calculated using the following equations.Qconv = h* (Tg -Tp)Sp(10)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%