2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD methodology and validation for single-phase flow in PWR fuel assemblies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, single-phase CFD codes have been used to predict fluid flow in fuel channels of both pressurized water reactors (PWR) [1] and sodium fast reactors (SFR) [2]. However, a whole core simulation with explicit representation of wire wraps and spacer grids would require tens of billions of computational cells and remains impractical for the near term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, single-phase CFD codes have been used to predict fluid flow in fuel channels of both pressurized water reactors (PWR) [1] and sodium fast reactors (SFR) [2]. However, a whole core simulation with explicit representation of wire wraps and spacer grids would require tens of billions of computational cells and remains impractical for the near term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results indicated that unknown flow distributions developed by the spacer grids could be captured by the experiments and these results could be used as fundamental information of the CFD calculation. On the other hand, the CFD calculation methodologies based on the experimental studies have been widely conducted [6,7]. The lateral field velocity along the flow direction in a single subchannel showed good agreement between the PIV and the CFD results, by comparing the center of vortices, same vortex rotation, same rod swirling flow, and same inter-assembly flow direction in gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The necessary refinement of the mesh near the walls and the choice of the type of wall treatment applied depend on the thickness and other characteristics of the boundary layer, and on the local turbulence [17]. For the turbulent flow regime of the case studied in this paper, the two most appropriate approaches are the high y+ and the two-layer all y+ wall treatments [20]. Both these two treatments assume that the near-wall cell lies within the boundary layer, i.e.…”
Section: Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%