2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD modeling of mass transfer in annular reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since both turbulence models predicted accurately the mass transfer coefficient of the experimental runs under turbulent flow regime, the use of any of them in the integrated CFD simulation tool is supported. In a separate study, further research has been performed utilizing other turbulence models, reactor configurations and geometries, as well as a wider range of flow rates, for obtaining more comprehensive conclusions on the performance of turbulence models for predicting liquid-wall mass transfer (Duran et al 2009b). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both turbulence models predicted accurately the mass transfer coefficient of the experimental runs under turbulent flow regime, the use of any of them in the integrated CFD simulation tool is supported. In a separate study, further research has been performed utilizing other turbulence models, reactor configurations and geometries, as well as a wider range of flow rates, for obtaining more comprehensive conclusions on the performance of turbulence models for predicting liquid-wall mass transfer (Duran et al 2009b). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above-mentioned equations, ρ is density, U is velocity, P is pressure, τ is viscous stress tensor, µ is molecular viscosity, I is unit tensor, m i is the mass fraction of species i, N is the total number of species, and D m is the molecular diffusivity of species i in the mixture [47]. This model has been successfully applied in the CFD simulations of photocatalytic reactors [43,45,46,49,50,53,[64][65][66][67][68]. This model is preferred for gas-phase photocatalytic reactions.…”
Section: Hydrodynamics Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specification of the apparent stress gradient (ρUU) is related to the adapted turbulence model [33]. Four hydrodynamic models are most often considered for modeling photoreactors: (a) standard k-ε model (S k-ε) [36,38,45,69,70], (b) the realizable k-ε model (R k-ε) [45,69], (c) the Reynolds stress model (RSM) [45,69], and (d) the low Reynolds number k-ε model (AKN-developed by Abe, Kondoh, and Nagano [21,45,71]). Duran et al performed the CFD for a single-phase flow mass transfer prediction in annular reactors using different hydrodynamic models.…”
Section: Hydrodynamics Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another method is to estimate mass transfer effects of building suitable numerical models that allow the prediction of the concentration fields inside the crystallizer. Melt layer crystallization of NaCl–H 2 O solution, which can be stationary or agitated around the wall of an internally cooled cylindrical tube, has been simulated by Guardani et al Duran et al carried out computational fluid dynamics simulations to predict mass transfer with different hydrodynamic models in annular reactors, with a constant concentration assumed at the solid–liquid surface. These models do not predict the effects of convective heat transfer and solid‐layer growth on the concentration distribution in the annulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%