A detailed comparison of the performance between a simple
Mono-Block-Layer-Build (MOLB) type Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) geometry and
a MOLB type SOFC with an embedded porous pipe in the air supply channel is
carried out. The study considers constant and variable porosities along the
porous pipe, fed with an airflow in a counter-flow arrangement. Four cases
are analyzed: a) without the porous pipe, b) with a pipe of constant
porosity, c) with two different porosities, and d) with four variable
porosities. This work is based in a three-dimensional Computational Fluid
Dynamics (CFD) model that considers the phenomena of mass transfer, heat
transfer, species transport and electrochemical reactions. Detailed
comparisons of the voltage, temperature and species concentration are
illustrated. The electrode-electrolyte interface contours of species
concentration, temperature and electric fields are compared. The results
show that there is approximately twice the current density in the geometry
that considers the two different porosities compared to the simple geometry.
The consumption of hydrogen has the same behavior for the entire tested
current density, while the availability of oxygen at the cathode-electrolyte
interface is improved in cases with porous pipe compared to the simple
MOLB-type geometry. The use of a porous pipe embedded in the air channel
showed that it is possible to have a wider operating range of a MOLB-type
SOFC, and allowed to obtain a more homogeneous temperature distribution on
the electrode-electrolyte interface of the SOFC, consequently, there is the
possibility of reducing the thermal stress in the SOFC.