2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD modelling of flow and heat transfer in the Taylor flow regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
68
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 64, the normalized bubble tip velocity is plotted as a function of were reported in [77,92]. In Fig.…”
Section: Reference Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Fig. 64, the normalized bubble tip velocity is plotted as a function of were reported in [77,92]. In Fig.…”
Section: Reference Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of mixture velocity, gas void fraction, liquid and gas inlet velocities and geometry of the tube or channel have been considered in the literature [75,77,85]. However, a fundamental understanding of the heat transfer mechanisms in boiling slug flow is still lacking.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many numerical studies to date have contributed to improved understanding of two-phase slug flow in small channels [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Kreutzer et al [21] investigated the influence of both the Capillary and Reynolds numbers on film thickness, pressure drop, and liquid flow patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of film thickness at the middle of the slug, and a correlation to predict the pressure drop across the slug, were obtained for 0.002 < Ca < 0.04 and 0 < Re < 900. Gupta et al [22] compared the volume of fluid (VOF) and level set (LS) interface tracking methods for simulating liquid-gas slug flow and heat transfer; both methods provided physically accurate results. The VOF method required a higher grid resolution, and the LS method a smaller time step, to accurately predict the flow field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%