2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD simulation of flow pattern and plume dimensions in submerged condensation and reactive gas jets into a liquid bath

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, direct coupled analysis is very difficult and needs a lot of calculation time. The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method was used for simulating two-phase flow with condensation [1,2]. However, it is very difficult to consider phase equilibrium in CFD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct coupled analysis is very difficult and needs a lot of calculation time. The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method was used for simulating two-phase flow with condensation [1,2]. However, it is very difficult to consider phase equilibrium in CFD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this limitation, the two-fluid model (TFM) and multifluid model (MFM) were developed. The centerline velocity and temperature predicted by the TFM and MFM were relatively better than those predicted by the LHF (Chan, 1993;Gulawani et al, 2008). Though the phenomena of submerged reactive jet have been addressed satisfactorily using the reaction model (LHF, TFM and MFM) with the PDF formulation, the prediction of the correct equilibrium state relationship for the species at specific operating condition was still a major limitation.…”
Section: Computational Workmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the previous literature, the focus was mainly on the estimation of plume dimensions and very limited information is available on the temperature and flow fields. Very few investigators (Chan and Abou-Ellail, 1991;Zhang et al, 2002;Gulawani et al, 2008) have compared the measured temperature and velocity profiles (and that too only centerline) with the predicted profiles of various models (LHF, TFM and MFM). Zhang et al (2002) and Gulawani et al (2008) have presented a comparison of the predicted centerline temperatures with the experimental data of Parnell et al (1989).…”
Section: Computational Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations