2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2012.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD simulation of solid–liquid stirred tanks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the very small influence of lift, Basset, and virtual mass forces on the simulated solid hold-dup profile [12], only the drag force may be considered in the interphase momentum exchange term (Schiller-Naumann). Results obtained using these two models are available in the literature and show that the Eulerian Multiphase model [13][14][15] is more accurate than the Eulerian Mixture model [16,17] when working with particle size higher than 100 m and solid fraction ranging between 0.2 and 16%,. Nevertheless, the Eulerian Mixture model is less time consuming and well adapted for low particle size (<10 m) and concentration (<0.1%) and should be suitable in our case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the very small influence of lift, Basset, and virtual mass forces on the simulated solid hold-dup profile [12], only the drag force may be considered in the interphase momentum exchange term (Schiller-Naumann). Results obtained using these two models are available in the literature and show that the Eulerian Multiphase model [13][14][15] is more accurate than the Eulerian Mixture model [16,17] when working with particle size higher than 100 m and solid fraction ranging between 0.2 and 16%,. Nevertheless, the Eulerian Mixture model is less time consuming and well adapted for low particle size (<10 m) and concentration (<0.1%) and should be suitable in our case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wadnerkar et al (2012) compared the effect of four drag models and found that the results from the modified Brucato drag model (Khopkar et al, 2006) were in reasonable agreement with the experimental data. Sardeshpande et al (2011) found that the coefficient in the Brucato drag model was dependent on the particle diameter, solids loading, particle Reynolds number, and prevailing turbulence.…”
Section: Reynolds Averaged Navier-stokes Simulationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18] Under the umbrella of multiphase flow regimes, the study of solid-liquid systems in mechanical mixing vessels has focused on turbulent operations. [19][20][21][22] Most of the studies have used Newtonian fluids (viscosity is independent of shear rate). The investigations have centered on calculating the minimum velocity that makes it possible to suspend solids in the mixing vessel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%