2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2012.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD simulation on the effect of primary nozzle geometries for a steam ejector in refrigeration cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
73
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The density-based implicit solver, which has been verified as a suitable solver for supersonic flow fields [19], [20], has been employed in this study. A second order upwind scheme was selected to discretise the equations to achieve higher accuracy at cell faces [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The density-based implicit solver, which has been verified as a suitable solver for supersonic flow fields [19], [20], has been employed in this study. A second order upwind scheme was selected to discretise the equations to achieve higher accuracy at cell faces [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second order upwind scheme was selected to discretise the equations to achieve higher accuracy at cell faces [21]. To define convergence of the solution, all residuals for calculations must fall to a specific level [20], which, for the present work was specified as less than 10 −5 . Essentially the same CFD modelling has been used for the three different geometries -different separations of the plates that form the ejector duct in the present work: the choice of solver, the turbulence model, the working fluid, the boundary conditions and convergence criteria were the same for both studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex flow in ejector has led to increasing reliance on CFD as a design tool (Fan et al 2011) and many researchers have agreed with CFD for predicting results closer to the experimental values (Rusly et al 2005;Ruangtrakoon et al 2013;Sriveerakul et al 2007). …”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry and the operating conditions of the ejector influence the entrainment ratio (Varga et al 2009). The effect of operating conditions on the performance of the ejector is relatively well established when compared with the geometrical effects (Ruangtrakoon et al 2013;Varga et al 2009;Sankarlal & Mani, 2005). The most influencing geometrical parameters over the performance of ejector are the area ratio (ratio of the area between constant area mixing chamber to primary nozzle throat), the primary nozzle exit position, the convergent angle of the constant pressure mixing section, and the length of constant area mixing section (Eames et al 2007;Jia & Wenjian, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation