2011
DOI: 10.2172/1024601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD validation in OECD/NEA t-junction benchmark.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computations disclosed in the previous paragraph were expensive and required access to significant High Performance Computing (HPC) resource. It can be estimated that an LES simulation for a straight inlet T-Junction at a moderate Reynolds number of 10 4 with a maximum grid resolution of 20 million required, at minimum, [ 300 cpu-hours [63] to compute; with this increasing further if higher order statistics are desired. In contrast a RANS computation could be completed in less than one day, whilst still providing accurate predictions of the time-averaged thermal-hydraulic characteristics [55].…”
Section: Thermal Mixing In a T-junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computations disclosed in the previous paragraph were expensive and required access to significant High Performance Computing (HPC) resource. It can be estimated that an LES simulation for a straight inlet T-Junction at a moderate Reynolds number of 10 4 with a maximum grid resolution of 20 million required, at minimum, [ 300 cpu-hours [63] to compute; with this increasing further if higher order statistics are desired. In contrast a RANS computation could be completed in less than one day, whilst still providing accurate predictions of the time-averaged thermal-hydraulic characteristics [55].…”
Section: Thermal Mixing In a T-junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…calculations [10] were compared with experiment and the numerical calculations given in [2] (Figs. 3 and 4).…”
Section: Flow In T-shaped Joint Of Circular Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure was verified on numerical tests [7,9,10] for Rayleigh numbers in the range 10 6 -10 16 and Reynolds numbers in the range 10 2 -10 4 . In the present work, the numerical calculations were compared with experiments: flow in circular tubes in a T joint and ERCOFTAC experiment studying natural convection of an incompressible liquid at high Rayleigh numbers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Argonne code Nek5000 participated in this benchmark using this mesh [17]. The mesh was generated with CUBIT 10.2, then modified to extend the (top) inflow and (side) outflow pipes.…”
Section: Hex-meshed T-junction Benchmark Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%