34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1996
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD validation strategies for compressible flow using interferometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the point, P(x , y , z ), is out of the physical domain the density at it is set to be ρ 0 so that there will be no contribution from it to density integration by using Eq. (2). If this point falls into the physical domain it is necessary to count its contribution.…”
Section: An Efficient Algorithm For Three-dimensional Density Integramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the point, P(x , y , z ), is out of the physical domain the density at it is set to be ρ 0 so that there will be no contribution from it to density integration by using Eq. (2). If this point falls into the physical domain it is necessary to count its contribution.…”
Section: An Efficient Algorithm For Three-dimensional Density Integramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, these methods must use a linear interpolation between fringes to obtain more data, which leads to errors in highly non-linear flowfields. Fourier transform fringe analysis supplies more information with high accuracy but is limited when the hetrodyning frequency of the finite-fringe interferograms is low, as discussed by Babinsky and Takayama [2]. However, all of the above-mentioned methods are of limited use for three-dimensional unsteady flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%