2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFTR protein quantification as a cystic fibrosis diagnostic biomarker in dried blood spots using multiple reaction monitoring tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…org/protparam/, accessed on 17 May 2022); (4) alignment to all dystrophin isomers performed using the SIM Alignment Tool for protein sequences, a bioinformatics resource portal maintained by the Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics (SIB); (5) post-translational modifications (PTMs) including methylation, glycosylation, and phosphorylation, with a risk of methylation, checked manually and for other PTMs by using the UniProt and Phospho. ELM databases [33,36,37,40]. As a result, SP1 (QVASSTGFCDQR) and SP2 (LGLLLHDSIQIPR) were identified as two signature peptides for dystrophin protein.…”
Section: Signature Peptide Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…org/protparam/, accessed on 17 May 2022); (4) alignment to all dystrophin isomers performed using the SIM Alignment Tool for protein sequences, a bioinformatics resource portal maintained by the Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics (SIB); (5) post-translational modifications (PTMs) including methylation, glycosylation, and phosphorylation, with a risk of methylation, checked manually and for other PTMs by using the UniProt and Phospho. ELM databases [33,36,37,40]. As a result, SP1 (QVASSTGFCDQR) and SP2 (LGLLLHDSIQIPR) were identified as two signature peptides for dystrophin protein.…”
Section: Signature Peptide Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%