2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.01.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

cGAS/STING cross-talks with cell cycle and potentiates cancer immunotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the addition of anlotinib to IR increased the production of dsDNA, enhanced the expression of crucial proteins of STING pathway, elevated the levels of Cxcl10 , and ultimately promoted CD8 + T cell infiltration. Consistent with our results, some studies suggest that STING is critical for antitumor immune response [ 37 39 ]. In addition, STING can also be activated directly by DNA damage response factors ATM and PARP-1 in a cGAS-independent manner, resulting in NF-κB activation, rather than IRF3 [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the current study, the addition of anlotinib to IR increased the production of dsDNA, enhanced the expression of crucial proteins of STING pathway, elevated the levels of Cxcl10 , and ultimately promoted CD8 + T cell infiltration. Consistent with our results, some studies suggest that STING is critical for antitumor immune response [ 37 39 ]. In addition, STING can also be activated directly by DNA damage response factors ATM and PARP-1 in a cGAS-independent manner, resulting in NF-κB activation, rather than IRF3 [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Consistently, previous studies have shown that abnormal changes in cell cycle-related pathways may increase the level of tumor mutation burden (TMB) and neoantigen in the tumor microenvironment, thereby increasing tumor immunogenicity and sensitivity to immunotherapy. 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 In summary, we identified a cluster of special cancer cells, called cell cycle subtype, that were critical for the NICB response in BLCA.
Figure 4 Reclustering of bladder cancer cells in the NICB cohort (A) UMAP plot of subgroups of bladder cancer cells.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether these different outcomes are due to the use of STING-deficient as opposed to low-expressing cells, or whether they involve virus or cell-type-specific differences remains to be determined. Of note, STING expression is frequently lost or repressed in cancer cells to avoid senescence upon DNA damage and promotes tumor progression [ 33 ]. The STING-independent induction of ICD by Ads might provide the virus with a unique advantage with respect to other oncolytic DNA viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%