1991
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(91)90934-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CH4 dissociation on metals: a quantum dynamics model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
173
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
9
173
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and ⌬V* represents the increase in barrier from steric hindering due to less than optimal impact parameters or orientational angles. For lack of any more definitive information, we simply assume that ⌬V* is distributed according to a Gaussian, f (⌬V*)ϭe Ϫ(⌬V*Ϫ⌬ 0 ) 2 /W 2 . We choose ⌬ 0 ϭ0.4 eV and Wϭ0.2 eV to insure a gradual turn on of barriers generally consistent with the experimental widths observed in Paper I, as well as many other experimental systems.…”
Section: ͑7͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1 and ⌬V* represents the increase in barrier from steric hindering due to less than optimal impact parameters or orientational angles. For lack of any more definitive information, we simply assume that ⌬V* is distributed according to a Gaussian, f (⌬V*)ϭe Ϫ(⌬V*Ϫ⌬ 0 ) 2 /W 2 . We choose ⌬ 0 ϭ0.4 eV and Wϭ0.2 eV to insure a gradual turn on of barriers generally consistent with the experimental widths observed in Paper I, as well as many other experimental systems.…”
Section: ͑7͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that such Arrhenius plots often do not measure true barrier heights has been stressed previously. 2,6 At isothermal conditions (T g ϭT s ) and at sufficiently high T ͑or wide barriers͒ so that tunneling is completely unimportant, then traditional transition state theory may provide an approximation to the isothermal rate of reaction for this mechanism of direct dissociation. Naturally transition state theory can say nothing about the molecular beam experiments under nonequilibrium initial conditions.…”
Section: Figure 4 Compares Calculated Values Of Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wave packet simulations of the methane dissociation reaction on transition metals have treated the methane molecule always as a diatomic up to now. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Apart from one C-H bond ͑a pseudo 3 stretch mode͒ and the molecule surface distance, either ͑mul-tiple͒ rotations or some lattice motion were included. None of these studies have looked at the role of the other internal vibrations, so there is no model that describes which vibrationally excited mode might be responsible for the experimental observed vibrational activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%