Chains of (Dis)Trust: Exploring the Underpinnings of Knowledge‐Sharing and Quality Care Across Mental Health Services

Brown, Patrick; Calnan, Michael

doi:10.1002/9781119276371.ch7

Cited by 8 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As discussed in the literature review, and confirmed by Brown and Calnan's. (2016) study and Blanchard et al's (2011) model, trust can be an issue for members of online communities, however, this does not necessarily deter them from online social engagement.…”

Section: Safetysupporting

confidence: 68%

“…More recently, there has been a shift in thinking when it comes to treatments with many patients (in general) taking an active role in deciding on the best method of healthcare provision for themselves (Allen et al, 2016). Brown and Calnan (2016) found that the level of trust between providers and service users was of vital importance. If trust is lost, it can exacerbate mental health issues and increase isolation (Heyes, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Socialization or Social Isolation?

Heyes

2018

Advances in Healthcare Information Systems and Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research project specifically examines the experience of online community support groups as reported by users. The project began out of concern that healthcare providers in the Global North are directing people with mental health problems to online services, without seemingly understanding the impact that this may have on the individuals. The research findings will be of particular interest to mental health practitioners and service providers in the UK and elsewhere in the Global North, and aims to influence decisions made for policies around developing new online mental health services.

show abstract

Section: Safetysupporting

confidence: 68%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socialization or Social Isolation?

Heyes

2018

Advances in Healthcare Information Systems and Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, in the context of increasingly controlling responses to organizational performance anxieties, practitioners are more likely to feel diminished in the eyes of the organization – to some degree to be dehumanized. As a chronic process, this is mirrored (Brown & Calnan, ) in the relationships with welfare recipients like Mrs A (Szmukler & Rose, ). At times, this is manifest in a form of provider pinpoint vision, in which particular organizational concerns become the point of focus.…”

Section: Organizational Dynamicsmentioning

confidence: 98%

‘What's Going to Happen Now?’ Changing Care Relations in a Psychosocial Context

Cohen¹

2019

Brit J Psychotherapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper advances a psychosocial hypothesis in understanding relations between recipients, and providers, of health and social care. In doing so, it draws on psychoanalytically informed work which considers the relation between the internal and external worlds and more generally the wider social context. The particular hypothesis in this paper relates to an understanding of an abusive form of relating underpinned by shame and envy. The paper suggests that exposure to these feeling states is more prevalent in a social world marked by increasing inequalities and environmental failures. This argument is underpinned with reference to qualitative and quantitative research, suggesting that antagonistic relationships are increasing and are part of a significant change in the culture. The argument is illustrated by a single detailed description of an initial consultation in an NHS psychotherapy service. An examination of the social context suggests how unhelpful or abusive relations may be manifest between health care providers and recipients, in care organizations and in the wider social world. This aspect of the argument is constructed with reference to relevant organizational and sociological literature. It is suggested that established relations of this type act to limit development, in this case a social development.

show abstract

“…If science-as-culture and politics combine to orient COVID-19 responses towards longer-term horizons of possibilities, then critical social scientists should ask which more proximate realities (whose deaths, for example) are being 'bracketed off' or 'looked past' by this distant gaze; and at what cost. They should also ask how policymaking, and levels of cooperation with these policies, are configured by multiple trust relations (see Brown and Calnan 2016). These would include trust in some sources of advice (national experts or WHO) rather than others, alongside how the level of policymakers' trust in citizens shapes which policy approaches they deem feasible.…”

Section: Probabalistic Knowledge Of Covid-19mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These would include trust in some sources of advice (national experts or WHO) rather than others, alongside how the level of policymakers' trust in citizens shapes which policy approaches they deem feasible. Policies based on presumptions of low levels of trust may further undermine trust and cooperation, especially where these policies are less inclusive (Brown and Calnan 2016).…”

Section: Probabalistic Knowledge Of Covid-19mentioning

confidence: 99%

Studying COVID-19 in light of critical approaches to risk and uncertainty: research pathways, conceptual tools, and some magic from Mary Douglas

Brown

2020

Health, Risk & Society

108

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This editorial is a response to the recent COVID-19 pandemic and underlines the valuable role that critical social science approaches to risk and uncertainty can play in helping us understand how risk is being understood and mitigated. Drawing on Heyman's approach to understanding risk as a configuration of probabilistic knowledge, time-framing, categories and values, I explore COVID-19 risk in relation to each of these features while also emphasising how different features stabilise one another. I suggest lines of inquiry into each of these features and their interrelatedness. I then move to present some important insights from the work of Mary Douglas which are especially germane to studying the risk of COVID-19 and, again, I raise possibilities for future research. Emphasising the centrality of ritual to Douglas's theory, I develop these considerations to encourage an exploration of magic and magical thinking, alongside rational approaches to COVID-19 risk.

show abstract

Chains of (Dis)Trust: Exploring the Underpinnings of Knowledge‐Sharing and Quality Care Across Mental Health Services

Cited by 8 publications

References 41 publications

Socialization or Social Isolation?

Socialization or Social Isolation?

‘What's Going to Happen Now?’ Changing Care Relations in a Psychosocial Context

Studying COVID-19 in light of critical approaches to risk and uncertainty: research pathways, conceptual tools, and some magic from Mary Douglas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About