1966
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1966.17.235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chains of modules with completely reducible quotients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the same preradical is obtained if we close the class X under direct sums and epimorphisms ; thus there is no loss of generality in assuming K closed under direct sums and epimorphisms 4 ). Start with a class 3£ of /?-modules and define F%(M) s the join of all Im η where η ranges over all jR-homomorphisms η : X -> M with all X £ X.…”
Section: Lemma 1 a Preradical F Commutes With Direct Sumsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is clear that the same preradical is obtained if we close the class X under direct sums and epimorphisms ; thus there is no loss of generality in assuming K closed under direct sums and epimorphisms 4 ). Start with a class 3£ of /?-modules and define F%(M) s the join of all Im η where η ranges over all jR-homomorphisms η : X -> M with all X £ X.…”
Section: Lemma 1 a Preradical F Commutes With Direct Sumsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(ii). Observe that Theorem 3.1 can be viewed as a generalization of the classical construction of upper and lower Loewy series in representation theory (for definitions, see e.g., [4]). Let V be a finite-dimensional k-vector space.…”
Section: Tits' Centre Conjecture For Fixed Point Subcomplexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If 1 e A, then, of course, the hypothesis (a) of the last corollary holds if and only if A is semisimple with the minimum condition. However, if 1 $ A, there are far more general rings satisfying (a) than merely those with the minimum condition (see [1]). The question arises whether in Theorem III, A -AT-A g JfF with A -M faithful and cyclic implies that A -M is simple.…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarks 2.7. (1) In particular, if D= D(R -M) and if À: R -> D is the natural map with kernel {r e R | rM=(0)}, then R is dense in D provided A(7?) is dense in the topological sense in X(R) £ D <= MM = n {M\M}, when M has the discrete topology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%