2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--28020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chalkboard vs. Paper: Technique for Improving Collaboration in Active Learning Activities

Abstract: is a lecturer in the Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Cornell University. She teaches required and elective courses covering a wide range of topics in the undergraduate Mechanical Engineering curriculum, including introductory calculus. Her main teaching interests include solid mechanics and finite element analysis. Ritz was recognized with a 2013 Cornell College of Engineering Excellence in Teaching Award. She received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Cornell in 2008.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A summary of their answers is (note that the number in parenthesis is the number of times this answer was given): The students were asked to provide additional comments. A summary of their answers is (note that the number in parenthesis is the number of times this answer was given):  Thank you (5)  Good job (5)  Program broadened their horizon (1)  More economics needed (1)  Share contact info prior to session (1)  More of a research focus would be helpful (1) In summary, the 2017 Summer Program at the University of Pittsburgh was a success. When the students were asked to rate the overall quality of the program, 86.7% of the students rated the program as "excellent", while 10% of the student ranked the program as "good" and one student left the question blank making up the remaining 3.3%.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A summary of their answers is (note that the number in parenthesis is the number of times this answer was given): The students were asked to provide additional comments. A summary of their answers is (note that the number in parenthesis is the number of times this answer was given):  Thank you (5)  Good job (5)  Program broadened their horizon (1)  More economics needed (1)  Share contact info prior to session (1)  More of a research focus would be helpful (1) In summary, the 2017 Summer Program at the University of Pittsburgh was a success. When the students were asked to rate the overall quality of the program, 86.7% of the students rated the program as "excellent", while 10% of the student ranked the program as "good" and one student left the question blank making up the remaining 3.3%.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies which detail the benefit of student collaboration and networking [1], [2]. However, there are not always adequate opportunities for students to network and collaborate with other students and faculty outside of their home institution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%