2018
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201809432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chalkogenbrücken: eine Übersicht

Abstract: In den letzten Jahrzehnten haben sich “unübliche” nichtkovalente Wechselwirkungen wie Anion‐π oder Halogenbrücken in vielen Forschungsbereichen zu interessanten Alternativen zu den allgegenwärtigen Wasserstoffbrücken entwickelt. Dies trifft – zu einem etwas geringeren Grad – auch auf Chalkogenbrücken zu, die nichtkovalenten Wechselwirkungen Lewis‐acider Chalkogenzentren. Dieser Kurzaufsatz soll einen Überblick über den Einsatz von Chalkogenbrücken in der kondensierten Phase geben, mit einem Fokus auf den neues… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original flipper probes such as Flipper‐TR® 5 are DTT [22, 38–40] dimers twisted out of co‐planarity due to methyl groups next to the single bond connecting the two monomers (Figure 2). The molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) [41] surface of flipper 5 in planar conformation ( p ) shows that flipper deplanarization does not originate from steric hindrance but from electrostatic repulsion between the methyls and the σ holes [42–49] on the endocyclic sulfur atoms (Figure 1). This repulsion represents the opposite of a chalcogen bond, [42–49] that is “repulsive chalcogen bonding” or an “anti‐chalcogen bond” (Figure 2).…”
Section: Planarizable Push‐pull Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The original flipper probes such as Flipper‐TR® 5 are DTT [22, 38–40] dimers twisted out of co‐planarity due to methyl groups next to the single bond connecting the two monomers (Figure 2). The molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) [41] surface of flipper 5 in planar conformation ( p ) shows that flipper deplanarization does not originate from steric hindrance but from electrostatic repulsion between the methyls and the σ holes [42–49] on the endocyclic sulfur atoms (Figure 1). This repulsion represents the opposite of a chalcogen bond, [42–49] that is “repulsive chalcogen bonding” or an “anti‐chalcogen bond” (Figure 2).…”
Section: Planarizable Push‐pull Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) [41] surface of flipper 5 in planar conformation ( p ) shows that flipper deplanarization does not originate from steric hindrance but from electrostatic repulsion between the methyls and the σ holes [42–49] on the endocyclic sulfur atoms (Figure 1). This repulsion represents the opposite of a chalcogen bond, [42–49] that is “repulsive chalcogen bonding” or an “anti‐chalcogen bond” (Figure 2). The mechanosensitivity of flipper probes is designed to originate from planarization by physical compression.…”
Section: Planarizable Push‐pull Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chalcogen-bond (ChB) is the net-attractive intermolecular interaction, often referred to as noncovalent interaction, between a Lewis-basic chalcogen-bond acceptor A and a Lewisacidic chalcogen-bond donor D 2 Ch featuring a chalcogen (group 16) atom Ch to which A binds. [1] Nearly 40 years ago, the first systematic study appeared of the chalcogen bond in which S•••Y (e. g., Y = S, O, F, Cl, or Br) nonbonded atomic contacts were investigated. [2] Early studies generally characterized chalcogen bonds as being predominantly electrostatic in nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Later on, the significance of charge transfer from the occupied orbital of a Lewis base into an empty σ*-type orbital of a chalcogen molecule controlling the chalcogen bond strength was recognized. [4] Chalcogen-bonding has since found applications in various fields of chemistry, [1] including, supramolecular, [5] biochemistry, [6] spectroscopy [7] and catalysis. [8] In this study, we have computationally analyzed a range of chalcogen-bonded D 2 Ch•••A À complexes (Ch = O, S, Se, Te; D, A = F, Cl, Br; see Scheme 1), using relativistic density functional theory (DFT) at ZORA-M06/QZ4P.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chalcogen bonding operates through the weak interaction between an electron donor and the chalcogen centre of a molecular entity, [11–12] representing a subclass of σ‐hole interactions [13] . Chalcogen bonding phenomenon was initially observed in the crystal structures of proteins and small organic molecules that contain disubstituted chalcogen fragments [14–17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%