2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenge of communicating uncertainty in systematic reviews when applying GRADE ratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organizations like the IPCC and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) have created calibrated uncertainty language that experts from different disciplines can use to describe scientific evidence and related uncertainties (Mach et al 2017;Swart et al 2009;Fischhoff 2016;Mastrandrea and Mach 2011). For example, the IPCC's Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties (henceforth: IPCC guidance note) describes how to judge confidence levels for the presented evidence, as well as likelihood terms associated with projected climate variables (Yohe and Oppenheimer 2011;Pidgeon and Fischhoff 2011;Budescu et al 2014;Mach et al 2017;Anttila et al 2018). Both confidence levels and likelihood terms are described in more detail below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizations like the IPCC and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) have created calibrated uncertainty language that experts from different disciplines can use to describe scientific evidence and related uncertainties (Mach et al 2017;Swart et al 2009;Fischhoff 2016;Mastrandrea and Mach 2011). For example, the IPCC's Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties (henceforth: IPCC guidance note) describes how to judge confidence levels for the presented evidence, as well as likelihood terms associated with projected climate variables (Yohe and Oppenheimer 2011;Pidgeon and Fischhoff 2011;Budescu et al 2014;Mach et al 2017;Anttila et al 2018). Both confidence levels and likelihood terms are described in more detail below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%