Challenges and best-practices of co-creation: A qualitative interview study in the field of climate services

Suhari, Mirko; Dressel, Markus; Schuck-Zöller, Susanne

doi:10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100282

Cited by 13 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Daniels et al. (2020) and Suhari et al. (2022) highlighted how co-creation between climate service providers and practitioners is essential for the development of climate resilience.…”

Section: Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Change can also move up to different levels. For example, Daniels et al (2020) and Suhari et al (2022) highlighted how co-creation between climate service providers and practitioners is essential for the development of climate resilience. Significantly in the context of service ecosystems, Finsterwalder and Kuppelwieser (2020) suggested that system well-being is dependent on how well public and private service organisation managers as well as policymakers understand the interdependencies and relationships between the different system levels.…”

Section: Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The possibilities of resilience for service organisations

Hall,

Naderi Koupaei

2024

JSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to provide an examination of the use of the concept of resilience and its use in service organisation, ecosystem-related literature and the wider social sciences. Design/methodology/approach This paper provides a critical review and commentary on the resilience literature in the social and business sciences and its relevance to service organisations. Findings Two main approaches towards resilience are identified (engineering and socio-ecological resilience) with each having different assumptions about the nature of resilience with corresponding implications for policymaking, indicator selection and application in a service context. These approaches operate at different scales and possess different properties with respect to the likelihood of enacting transformative service marketing. Practical implications Different conceptualisations of resilience have profound implications for resilience-related policymaking as well as understanding change and adaptation in service ecosystems and organisations. Social implications The transformative possibilities of resilience are connected to the active enhancement and construction of social capacity by service organisations and the persistent resilience of the resilience concept. Originality/value This paper highlights the importance of clearly defining the resilience concept and its implications for research and transformative service organisations.

show abstract

Section: Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

The possibilities of resilience for service organisations

Hall,

Naderi Koupaei

2024

JSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has been suggested that working with diverse stakeholders in a co-design setting facilitates the production of more inventive concepts and ideas ( 8 ). During the co-design process, stakeholders, for whom the final resources are being built, are the experts and so have the opportunity to contribute to the development of information, ideas, and concepts ( 9 ). Throughout the whole design and development process, they are able to provide the required tools for the expression and ideation of their requirements, as well as make crucial judgments ( 9 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…During the co-design process, stakeholders, for whom the final resources are being built, are the experts and so have the opportunity to contribute to the development of information, ideas, and concepts ( 9 ). Throughout the whole design and development process, they are able to provide the required tools for the expression and ideation of their requirements, as well as make crucial judgments ( 9 ). Co-design is employed as a technique for collaborative design, with key stakeholders collaborating concurrently in the co-creation process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Thematic analysis of stakeholder perceptions for co-creative healthcare XR resource design and development; traversing a minefield of opportunities

Antoniou,

Varella,

Pickering

et al. 2024

Front. Digit. Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe expansive curricular volume of healthcare education makes a necessity the incorporation of innovative methods and immersive media in it. The core challenge in such approaches is the timely development of relevant immersive content such as Virtual, Augmented or Mixed Reality (VR/AR/MR) resources for healthcare topics. There is currently significant interest in the use of co-creative methods for streamlining immersive content development.MethodsA core research pursuit in this translational research field is the formulation of evidence-based, optimized workflows that streamline immersive content creation allowing for rapid expansion of innovative educational approaches in healthcare curricula. The purpose of this paper is to aggregate the perceptions of healthcare technologists and educators who participated in a series of co-creation sessions in order to elicit their best practice insights for design and development of XR educational resources using co-creative methods.ResultsAccording to our thematic analysis, findings of the qualitative study demonstrated that a rigorous organizational approach is required to maintain a constructive exchange of information and to keep the design process alive for both content and technical experts. In addition, rapid prototype and display of co-created features can empower their contributions and help them design more efficiently.DiscussionCo-creative content production can benefit from adaption of existing frameworks and lightweight authoring environments that can facilitate generalized XR content development use cases.

show abstract

“…There is considerable ongoing activity to improve the communication between climate modeling communities and climate impact or other user communities (e.g., Lemos et al, 2012;Huebener et al, 2017b;Rössler et al, 2017;Chimani et al, 2020;Tart et al, 2020;Hewitt et al, 2021;Suhari et al, 2022). There are also numerous activities to provide suitable usertailored climate simulation information and climate services (e.g., Goddard, 2016;Buontempo et al, 2018;Bülow et al, 2019) or tools to generate said information (e.g., Raoult et al, 2017;Pérez-Zanón et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improved representativeness of simulated climate using natural units and monthly resolution

Huebener¹,

Gelhardt²,

Lang³

2022

Front. Clim.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a considerable discrepancy between the temporal and spatial resolution required by climate impact researchers, policy makers, and adaptation planners on the one hand and climate data providers on the other hand. While the spatial and temporal aggregation of climate data is necessary to increase the reliability and robustness of climate information, this often counteracts or even prohibits their use in adaptation planning. The problem is twofold (i.e., space and time) and needs to be approached accordingly. Climate impact research and adaptation planning are the domain of impact experts, politicians, and planners, rather than climate experts. Thus, besides the spatial and temporal resolution, information also needs to be provided on platforms and in data formats that are easily accessible, easy to handle, and easy to understand. We discuss possible steps toward bridging the gap using an example from the federal state Hesse (Germany) as illustration. We aggregate the climate data at a level of “natural units” and provide them as monthly data. We discuss the pros and cons of this kind of processed data for impact research and decision making. The spatial aggregation to “natural units” delivers suitable spatial aggregation, while maintaining physical geographic structures and their climatic characteristics. Within these “natural units,” single grid cell values are usable for climate impact analyses or decision making. The temporal resolution is monthly values, i.e., deviations of single month values for the scenario period from climatological monthly values in the (simulated) reference period. This resolution allows analyzing compound events or consecutive events on a monthly scale within a climatological (30-year) period.

show abstract

Challenges and best-practices of co-creation: A qualitative interview study in the field of climate services

Cited by 13 publications

References 45 publications

The possibilities of resilience for service organisations

The possibilities of resilience for service organisations

Thematic analysis of stakeholder perceptions for co-creative healthcare XR resource design and development; traversing a minefield of opportunities

Improved representativeness of simulated climate using natural units and monthly resolution

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About