Fish for Life 2005
DOI: 10.1017/9789048505326.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and Concerns in Capture Fisheries and Aquaculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four key concerns have been identified in fisheries governance, namely, ecosystem health, social justice, livelihoods and food security (Chuenpagdee et al, 2005;Bavinck et al, 2013). In their deliberation about these four main concerns, the authors do not make a point of distinguishing between large-and small-scale fisheries.…”
Section: Key Concerns Affecting Small-scale Fisheriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four key concerns have been identified in fisheries governance, namely, ecosystem health, social justice, livelihoods and food security (Chuenpagdee et al, 2005;Bavinck et al, 2013). In their deliberation about these four main concerns, the authors do not make a point of distinguishing between large-and small-scale fisheries.…”
Section: Key Concerns Affecting Small-scale Fisheriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four key concerns have been identified in fisheries governance, namely, ecosystem health, social justice, livelihoods and food security (Chuenpagdee et al, 2005;Bavinck et al, 2013). They are all related to issues and challenges found in many fisheries around the world, such as unsustainable resource exploitation, poor recognition of fishing rights, poverty, lack of alternative employment and distortion in markets and supply chains (Jentoft and Eide, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current climate of severe overexploitation and decline of many fish stocks, fleet overcapacity and widespread concern about degradation of aquatic ecosystems and inappropriate fisheries management regimes (Kooiman and Bavinck, 2005; Worm et al , 2006; FAO, 2010; Pierce et al , 2011), fishery governance faces the challenge to resolve the conflicts that result from seeking to simultaneously pursue the goals of maintaining a healthy ecosystem whilst continuing to derive social and economic benefits from fisheries (Thorpe et al , 2005). To add to this, fishery governance needs to address issues associated with (or affected by) globalisation such as ecosystem health, social justice, livelihood, and food security and safety (Chuenpagdee et al , 2005). Thus, as pointed out by Jentoft (2005), fisheries governance is a never‐ending process that requires robust and flexible institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions are horizontal (Kooiman, 2003; and vertical (Berkes, 2009). Diverse sources of knowledge are recognized (Berkes, 2009), including social and natural sciences, as well as local and indigenous knowledge (Chuenpagdee et al, 2005;Hurley & Manel, 2015). Co-management is a recognized and influential form of co-governance and thus is included in this analysis.…”
Section: Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported outcomes of governance modes supported the analysis on performance. The approach suggested by Chuenpagdee et al (2005) was used to expand the focus of performance on commercial target species and account for ecosystems (e.g., associated species and habitats), social (e.g., food security) and governance outcomes (e.g., distribution of benefits, power distribution, the protection of the vulnerable). These dimensions were identified in existing literature for the analysis of performance.…”
Section: The Shadow Of Hierarchy In Marine Fisheries Governancementioning
confidence: 99%