2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and lessons learned from the rapid operationalization of a prospective cohort to study the natural history and neurodevelopmental outcomes of postnatal Zika virus infection among infants and children in rural Guatemala

Abstract: During the course of the 2015–2017 outbreak of Zika virus (ZIKV) in the Americas, the emerging virus was recognized as a congenital infection that could damage the developing brain. As the Latin American ZIKV outbreak advanced, the scientific and public health community questioned if this newly recognized neurotropic flavivirus could affect the developing brain of infants and young children infected after birth. We report here the study design, methods and the challenges and lessons learned from the rapid oper… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From June 2017 to July 2018, 499 infants and their mothers were enrolled at 0–3 months of age into the parent study, which leveraged an existing maternal-child health program to identify a convenience sample of mothers/infants in the community. Per study design, 18 there were no exclusion criteria other than living outside the study catchment area and inappropriate age, though children who were acutely unwell at the time of study screening were referred for medical evaluation and enrollment deferred. Gestational age and intrauterine growth are typically unknown in this community, though the cohort 19 and community 20 have a high prevalence of microcephaly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From June 2017 to July 2018, 499 infants and their mothers were enrolled at 0–3 months of age into the parent study, which leveraged an existing maternal-child health program to identify a convenience sample of mothers/infants in the community. Per study design, 18 there were no exclusion criteria other than living outside the study catchment area and inappropriate age, though children who were acutely unwell at the time of study screening were referred for medical evaluation and enrollment deferred. Gestational age and intrauterine growth are typically unknown in this community, though the cohort 19 and community 20 have a high prevalence of microcephaly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%