2010
DOI: 10.4155/tde.10.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and Opportunities in dermal/transdermal Delivery

Abstract: Transdermal drug delivery is an exciting and challenging area. There are numerous transdermal delivery systems currently available on the market. However, the transdermal market still remains limited to a narrow range of drugs. Further advances in transdermal delivery depend on the ability to overcome the challenges faced regarding the permeation and skin irritation of the drug molecules. Emergence of novel techniques for skin permeation enhancement and development of methods to lessen skin irritation would wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
283
0
12

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 498 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
2
283
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…[63,64] However, it is to be noted that chemical enhancers have more successfully been used mostly for small molecule delivery, as they do not provide similar degrees of penetration enhancement as physical enhancement methods. [65] This notion was corroborated in our study where no improvement in penetration of FITC-BSA, FITC-OVA, or FITC-insulin across the skin was observed in the presence of CPEs such as ethanol or DGME, while a significant enhancement in delivery of these proteins was noted in the presence of CAGE. Further quantitation of 3 H-BSA penetration into different layers of the skin after 24 h treatment with different materials also demonstrated significantly higher accumulation of BSA in the dermis and acceptor chamber when the protein was delivered using CAGE compared to PBS or aforementioned CPEs.…”
Section: Wwwadvhealthmatdesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…[63,64] However, it is to be noted that chemical enhancers have more successfully been used mostly for small molecule delivery, as they do not provide similar degrees of penetration enhancement as physical enhancement methods. [65] This notion was corroborated in our study where no improvement in penetration of FITC-BSA, FITC-OVA, or FITC-insulin across the skin was observed in the presence of CPEs such as ethanol or DGME, while a significant enhancement in delivery of these proteins was noted in the presence of CAGE. Further quantitation of 3 H-BSA penetration into different layers of the skin after 24 h treatment with different materials also demonstrated significantly higher accumulation of BSA in the dermis and acceptor chamber when the protein was delivered using CAGE compared to PBS or aforementioned CPEs.…”
Section: Wwwadvhealthmatdesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Furthermore, the convenience and non-invasive nature of TDD offers improved patient acceptability and compliance. The TDD market, worth $12.7 billion dollars in 2005, is expected to reach $32 billion in 2015 and as such, has been an important area of pharmaceutical research and development for the last few decades [1,2,3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Суть химического способа улучшения проник-новения ЛВ через кожу заключается либо в моди-фицировании молекул ЛВ, либо во введении в ТТС активаторов переноса: спиртов (этанол, пентанол, бензиловый спирт, лауриловый спирт, пропиленгли-коль, глицерин), монотерпенов (D-лимонен, карвон и анисовое масло), сульфоксидов (диметилсульфок-сид), фосфолипидов (лецитин), жирных кислот (оле-иновая кислота, линолевая кислота, валериановая кислота и лауриновая кислота) и их эфиров, аминов (диэтаноламин и триэтаноламин), амидов (мочевина, диметилацетамид, диметилформамид и производ-ные пирролидона), углеводородов (алканы и сквале-ны) и поверхностно-активных веществ (ПАВ) (лау-реат натрия, цетилтриметиламмоний бромид, Brij ® , TWEEN ® и холат натрия) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. К активаторам переноса с хорошим потенциалом за счет наличия большого количества ненасыщенных жирных кислот относят натуральные масла (кукурузное, арахисовое и масло жожоба).…”
Section: усиление чрескожного переноса при использовании химических пunclassified
“…Химические усилители часто эффективны в отношении увеличения проницаемости кожи для низкомолекулярных соединений, тогда как для обеспечения и усиления транспортировки высоко-молекулярных молекул (пептидов, белков, нуклео-тидов) только химических усилителей часто бывает недостаточно, поэтому дополнительно применяют физические методы, которые основаны на элект-рическом (ионофорез и электрофорез, электропо-рация) и механическом воздействии (микроиглы) [12][13][14][15]31].…”
Section: физические способы увеличения проницаемости кожиunclassified