Optimizing sample preparation for the isotopic measurement of 10Be extracted from quartz mineral separates has a direct positive effect on the efficiency of sample production and the accuracy and precision of isotopic analysis. Here, we demonstrate the value of tracing Be throughout the extraction process (both after dissolution and after processing), producing pure Be (by optimizing column chromatography methods and quantifying quartz mineral separate purity), and minimizing backgrounds (through reducing both laboratory process blanks and 10B isobaric interference). These optimization strategies increase the amount of 10Be available for analysis during accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), while simultaneously decreasing interference and contamination, and ensuring that sample performance matches standard performance during analysis. After optimization of our laboratory's extraction methodology, 9Be3+ beam currents, a metric for sample purity and Be yield through the extraction process, matched the 9Be3+ beam currents of AMS standards analyzed at the same time considering nearly 800 samples. Optimization of laboratory procedures leads to purer samples that perform better, more consistently, and more similarly to standards during AMS analysis, allowing for improved dating and quantification of Earth surface processes.
February 2, 2016To the Editor:After performing the revisions suggested by two reviewers, we are resubmitting our manuscript, An Approach for Optimizing In Situ Cosmogenic 10 Be Sample Preparation, for publication in Quaternary Geochronology.We appreciated the comments from both reviewers and found that their suggestions improved the manuscript. In our revisions, we focused particular attention toward broadening our discussion of measurement accuracy, clarifying the impact of Ti impurities in samples, providing more information about beam current normalization, and benchmarking our methods against those previously used in our laboratory. As a group, we considered each suggestion and addressed it in the way that we thought most benefited the manuscript. In the following pages, you will find a list of the reviewers' suggestions and details about how we incorporated those suggestions.We are optimistic that our revisions have addressed the reviewers' concerns and that the manuscript has grown in both clarity and applicability. Thank you in advance for considering our revised draft. The paper of Corbett et al. describes in detail the chemical separation procedure for Be-10 in quartz samples applied at the University of Vermont. They show how their column chemistry was optimized for the purification of Be and they impressively demonstrate, on the statistical base of about 800 samples, that their lab constantly produces high quality Be-10 samples. This paper is important not only for newcomers in the field, e.g. who want to set up their own lab, but also for the existing cosmo labs because it demonstrates the importance of quality control e.g. to avoid systematic errors in the final Be-10 ages. D...