2023
DOI: 10.1007/s40831-023-00720-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and Opportunities of Agricultural Biomass as a Replacement for PCI Coal in the Ironmaking Blast Furnace: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to other processes like fast pyrolysis and gasification, which may prioritize the generation of bio-oil or syngas, hydrothermal carbonization, and slow pyrolysis are recognized for generating larger biochar yields (Salimbeni et al 2023 ). These results aligned with the reports of Abhi et al ( 2023 ); Safarian ( 2023a ), which revealed that slow pyrolysis and HTC are the most effective techniques for producing high-yielding biochar, with yields that vary from 25 to 90 weight%, and even more subject to the reactor type, feedstock, and operating circumstances. This finding was corroborated by another study, which showed that for each of the various applications, including recarburizing in steel-making, coal blend for coke-making, coke breeze for sintering, coal injectant for the BF, the characteristics of biochars generated through pyrolysis of biomass can be customized, enabling optimum efficiency and greater usefulness of the char (Jahanshahi et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Biochar Production Techniquessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to other processes like fast pyrolysis and gasification, which may prioritize the generation of bio-oil or syngas, hydrothermal carbonization, and slow pyrolysis are recognized for generating larger biochar yields (Salimbeni et al 2023 ). These results aligned with the reports of Abhi et al ( 2023 ); Safarian ( 2023a ), which revealed that slow pyrolysis and HTC are the most effective techniques for producing high-yielding biochar, with yields that vary from 25 to 90 weight%, and even more subject to the reactor type, feedstock, and operating circumstances. This finding was corroborated by another study, which showed that for each of the various applications, including recarburizing in steel-making, coal blend for coke-making, coke breeze for sintering, coal injectant for the BF, the characteristics of biochars generated through pyrolysis of biomass can be customized, enabling optimum efficiency and greater usefulness of the char (Jahanshahi et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Biochar Production Techniquessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The ISI can help in carbon capture efforts by adding biochar-enriched soils into their operation, compensating its CO 2 emissions, and supplementing the general climate change alleviation plans. Waste management: The production of biochar from industrial, domestic, agricultural, livestock, forest, and municipal solid wastes, among others, serves as a waste management technique (Abhi et al 2023 ; Xu et al 2021 ). Several studies on generating biochar form wastes/residues have been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Significance Of Biochar In Steel Industrial Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations