ABSTRACT. This study illustrates the potential synergies and conflicts of interest between farmers and insurers in the selectionlimatic variability significantly affects agricultural production, profitability, and risk (Hansen, 2002;Chen and Chang, 2005). Several studies have shown that agricultural management has been improved during the last years based on the prediction of seasonal climate (Baigorria et al., 2008;Podestá et al., 2002;Nnaji, 2001). Predictability of seasonal climate variations can help in reducing farm risk by tailoring agricultural management strategies to mitigate the impacts of adverse conditions or to take advantage of favorable conditions (Letson et al., 2005;Hill and Mjelde, 2002). In this respect, crop insurance offers farmers economic stability under the uncertainty of future random events, including climate (Mahul, 2001). However, optimal crop insurance choices for farmers differ from those of insurers. In addition, once farmers buy crop insurance, they have a greater incentive to engage in risky behavior; clearly moral hazard can cause farmers' and insurers' interests to diverge. Predictable climate variations may offer an opportunity to close this gap by improving some monitoring features of the crop insurance market (Fraser, 2004).Previous research on the value of climate forecasts on the crop insurance market has been performed from either the farmer's or the insurer's viewpoints, but none have investigated the potential interactions between them. Thus, this article adds to the literature by evaluating optimal crop insurance strategies for farmers and insurers based on different climatic scenarios and levels of risk aversion. The goal of this study is to offer a thorough picture of the value of climate forecasts for the whole crop insurance market. Our hypothesis is that both conflicts and synergies exist between farmers and insurers regarding crop insurance selection and that they are influenced by climate variability.To reach our goal, we analyze the case of a representative 40 ha, rainfed, cotton-peanut farm located in Jackson County, Florida. The southeastern U.S. offers an illustrative setting for studying the interaction of climate variability and crop insurance strategies. Several studies have shown that the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a strong driver of seasonal climate variability that impacts cotton and peanut crop yields in this geographical area (e.g., Hansen, 2002;Jones et al., 2000). In this study, we integrate biophysical simulation models and stochastic non-linear whole-farm optimization models to identify an optimum crop insurance product for farmers and insurers based on different scenarios for ENSO and levels for risk aversion. The riskiness of the decision strategies is evaluated using a constant relative risk aversion utility function for farmers (Letson et al., 2005) and a conditional value-at-risk model (CVaR) for insurers (Liu et al., 2008). These results are then contrasted to evaluate the synergies and conflicts between the two groups under stu...