“…The focus of outcome analyses have tended to include adherence to harm-reduction practices (Latkin, Sherman, & Knowlton, 2003), increased motivation to engage in protective behaviors (Broadhead et al, 1998), a decline in risky behavior (Dickson-Gomez, Weeks, Martinez, & Convey, 2006; Hays, Rebchook, & Kegeles, 2003; Knauz et al, 2007; Williamson, Hart, Flowers, Frankis, & Der, 2001), and increased self-efficacy on the individual level (Bryan, Robbins, Ruiz, & O’Neill, 2006; Norr, Norr, McElmurry, Tlou, & Moeti, 2004), as well as increased self-efficacy in members of the peers’ social network and community (Kennedy, Rogers, & Crossley, 2007; Latkin & Knowlton, 2005; Weeks, Li, et al, 2009). Programs that can demonstrate changes in individual-level behavior are considered successful, and if successfully replicated, are often given continued support (Gandelman et al, 2006; NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial Group, 2007). Thus, changes in risky behavior are often the measurement by which peer-driven, HIV-intervention programs are evaluated.…”