2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and promises for translating computational tools into clinical practice

Abstract: Computational modeling and associated methods have greatly advanced our understanding of cognition and neurobiology underlying complex behaviors and psychiatric conditions. Yet, no computational methods have been successfully translated into clinical settings. This review discusses three major methodological and practical challenges (A. precise characterization of latent neurocognitive processes, B. developing optimal assays, C. developing large-scale longitudinal studies and generating predictions from multi-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a growing interest among researchers to develop and apply computational (i.e., cognitive) models to classical assessment tools to help guide clinical decision‐making (e.g., Ahn & Busemeyer, ; Batchelder, ; McFall & Townsend, ; Neufeld, Vollick, Carter, Boksman, & Jetté, ; Ratcliff, Spieler, & Mckoon, ; Treat, McFall, Viken, & Kruschke, ; Wallsten, Pleskac, & Lejuez, ). Despite this interest, clinical assessment has yet to be influenced by the many computational assays available today (see Ahn & Busemeyer, ). There are many potential reasons for this, but two important factors are the lack of (a) precise characterizations of neurocognitive processes and (b) optimal, externally valid paradigms for assessing psychiatric conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing interest among researchers to develop and apply computational (i.e., cognitive) models to classical assessment tools to help guide clinical decision‐making (e.g., Ahn & Busemeyer, ; Batchelder, ; McFall & Townsend, ; Neufeld, Vollick, Carter, Boksman, & Jetté, ; Ratcliff, Spieler, & Mckoon, ; Treat, McFall, Viken, & Kruschke, ; Wallsten, Pleskac, & Lejuez, ). Despite this interest, clinical assessment has yet to be influenced by the many computational assays available today (see Ahn & Busemeyer, ). There are many potential reasons for this, but two important factors are the lack of (a) precise characterizations of neurocognitive processes and (b) optimal, externally valid paradigms for assessing psychiatric conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies suggest that, temporal information emerges from neural properties that are naturally time-varying, such as short-term synaptic plasticity24. Our results show, for the first time to our knowledge, how these dynamics can be captured by non-invasive electrophysiological recordings, addressing an important lack of evidence in favour of this population dynamics hypothesis in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For example, the recovered states could be related to the accumulator process: as pulses are accumulated, they generate activity that is reflected across electrodes. However, it is important to mention that, in a broad view, state-dependent models can be extended to be consistent with the majority of timing models26, with the different models imposing specific constraints on what would define the state space. Thus, although our findings open an important and missing first step in how to investigate state dependent models in human EEG, they do not, at the moment, present conclusive evidence in favour of such view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of ADO also come with costs. For example, trials that are most informative can be ones that are also difficult for the participant (Ahn & Busemeyer, 2016). Repeated presentation of difficult trials can frustrate and fatigue participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%