2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and recent developments in supply and value chains of electric vehicle batteries: A sustainability perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
96
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present technology of choice to power most of the electronic devices is the rechargeable lithium‐ion battery, that relies on the reversible (de)intercalation of Li + ions into and from electrodes typically with a layered structure [4] . Despite the notable progress achieved by intensive research work, challenges in the Li‐ion technology such as the relatively limited energy content, the environmental and economic impact of the materials, and the need for an efficient recycling process still hinder a complete transition to a zero‐emission mobility [5] . In this scenario, rechargeable lithium‐sulfur (Li−S) battery may represent an alternative system due the low cost of sulfur, and the high theoretical energy associated with the multi‐electron electrochemical conversion reaction summarized by equation : [6] true16Li++normalS8+16e-8Li2normalS …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present technology of choice to power most of the electronic devices is the rechargeable lithium‐ion battery, that relies on the reversible (de)intercalation of Li + ions into and from electrodes typically with a layered structure [4] . Despite the notable progress achieved by intensive research work, challenges in the Li‐ion technology such as the relatively limited energy content, the environmental and economic impact of the materials, and the need for an efficient recycling process still hinder a complete transition to a zero‐emission mobility [5] . In this scenario, rechargeable lithium‐sulfur (Li−S) battery may represent an alternative system due the low cost of sulfur, and the high theoretical energy associated with the multi‐electron electrochemical conversion reaction summarized by equation : [6] true16Li++normalS8+16e-8Li2normalS …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] Despite the notable progress achieved by intensive research work, challenges in the Li-ion technology such as the relatively limited energy content, the environmental and economic impact of the materials, and the need for an efficient recycling process still hinder a complete transition to a zero-emission mobility. [5] In this scenario, rechargeable lithium-sulfur (LiÀ S) battery may represent an alternative system due the low cost of sulfur, and the high theoretical energy associated with the multi-electron electrochemical conversion reaction summarized by equation ( 1): [6] 16Li þ þ S 8 þ 16e À Ð 8Li 2 S…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li-ion battery cells have been widely adopted for reasons such as less self-discharge, less memory effect, higher energy density per weight and volume, stable performance, and longer cycle life compared to other types of secondary batteries. They are used in a variety of systems such as portable electronics [1], electric vehicles [2], spacecraft and aircraft power systems [3], renewable energy systems [4], marine current energy systems [5], stationary energy storage [6], etc. The performance of the battery cell depends on the degree of degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the number of EVs has increased from a negligible amount before 2010 to 11.3 million EVs in 2020 [24], and it is projected to dramatically increase to more than 142 million EVs by 2030 [25]. A key component of EV powertrains is the battery pack, whereby the lithium-ion battery (LIB) has emerged as the dominant and preferred battery technology and is expected to remain so for the years to come [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while beneficial in terms of reducing GHG emissions, a massive shift to EVs could have an indirect negative impact up and down the supply chain. A key concern is the need for large amounts of critical raw materials (CRM) for LIB production [24,28,29]. Despite difference in definitions and assessment methods [30], CRM can be largely understood as materials that have (1) a high supply risk and (2) a high vulnerability to supply disruption [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%