Most of the Malaysian oil fields are mature and the need for IOR/EOR driven development planning is vital to maintain the national production. The most common EOR methods employed in Malaysia are immiscible WAG and CEOR. However, one of the main problems in WAG is how to control gas mobility to minimize the conformance issue and maximize the 3-phase region in the reservoir. Using Foam is a relatively cost effective way of controlling gas mobility by means of low concentration of surfactant. However, the practical implementation has been hindered due to the lack of general understanding of the complex process of foam phase behavior and flow dynamics in porous media, the absence of reliable predictive models of multi-phase foam flow, and also the challenges in upscaling the lab results to the field application.The data integration, fundamental understanding, input evaluation and predictive modeling of WAG and Foam Assisted WAG (FAWAG) have been reviewed in this work using two extensive core flooding data of one of the Malaysian oil field in two different simulators. Review of the laboratory procedure showed the importance of taking proper pre-design measures to be able to achieve conclusive results. The modeling practice shows that output parameters from coreflood experiments might be affected by forced history matching and consequently unrealistic simulation input parameters as well as the shortcomings of the predictive capability of different simulators.The study showed that in the core flood experiments and simulations, various aspects need to be carefully considered including:• Reliable data integration and understanding of the physics/dynamics involved in the process are important for proper evaluation of the foam effect. • Simulation studies to be used for the pre-design and optimization of the coreflood experiment and parameters (i.e., rate, cycles, pore volume, etc.). • The measured rates and pressures must be of consistent resolution to be able to capture the exact phase breakthroughs and precise fractional flows of the experiment. • The SCAL endpoints and WAG parameters must be measured and fixed prior to FAWAG experiment and simulation.• Capillary end effect, formation water salinity effect on contact angle and capillary pressure impact on coreflood results needs to be carefully considered in both laboratory and modeling stages. • Different commercial simulators may results in different prediction on foam output and the effect, hence proper evaluation, de-risking and sensitivity analysis should be performed to capture the foam EOR window of opportunity.