2013
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.662603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and trends in the allocation of the workforce in manufacturing shop floors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the above characteristics also influence how a given number of workers can be coordinated between subtasks. Limitation: in the real-life assembly industry, decisions on worker assignments are more dynamic and also based on external factors, such as the total number of workers available, demand, schedule tightness, and various disturbances (Saadat et al 2013). Additionally, factors related to individuals, such as skills (De Bruecker et al 2015) and chemistries between workers, have their own effects.…”
Section: Managerial Implications and Limitations Of The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the above characteristics also influence how a given number of workers can be coordinated between subtasks. Limitation: in the real-life assembly industry, decisions on worker assignments are more dynamic and also based on external factors, such as the total number of workers available, demand, schedule tightness, and various disturbances (Saadat et al 2013). Additionally, factors related to individuals, such as skills (De Bruecker et al 2015) and chemistries between workers, have their own effects.…”
Section: Managerial Implications and Limitations Of The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While assembly production faces variation as a result of e.g. volatile customer demand and differences between workers (Buzacott 2013), the ability to match the current capacity of the workforce with the floor-level processes is becoming increasingly important (Ruiz-Torres and Mahmoodi 2007;Saadat et al 2013). In order to e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corominas, Olivella, and Pastor (2010) considered the problem of assigning and scheduling a set of tasks to a set of workers, according to which worker's performance for a given task depends on the worker experience. Recently, Saadat et al (2013) presented an overview of a recent study in the application of the principles of holonic manufacturing systems, as an example of intelligent system approach to develop a flexible workforce allocation model. An interesting case study that confirms the beneficial impact of staff planning in cost reduction was proposed by Hemig, Rieck, and Zimmermann (forthcoming), who modelled by a non-linear mixed integer programming, and solved by dynamic programming, a real manufacturing system based on parallel assembly lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stated that a worker coordination policy 'allocates workers to tasks (or tasks to workers) over time'. Several earlier studies examined worker coordination policies to show how they influence system performance (see the paper of Saadat et al, 2013, in which challenges and trends concerning workforce allocation are reviewed). Since in production systems workers are typically specialised in one task of one station, workforce flexibility and coordination between the stations are based on cross-training that enables workers to perform multiple task types.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%